Coaching

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on google
Google+
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Coaching can have a profound impact on leadership skills, relationships with staff and board members, overall job satisfaction and work-life balance, confidence, and adaptability.  John Gilvar’s approach to professional and leadership coaching emphasizes the following touchstones:

  • Self-directed
    • You’re the expert of your own life, whether as a leader at work or otherwise.
  • Solution-focused
    • We focus together on attaining your vision of the future, exploring and then refining a path toward your goals.
  • Stretch
    • Your coach is in your corner as you move beyond habitual patterns and strategies, leaning into your learning edge.  
  • Structure
    • We work on concrete action steps and timelines that move your learning forward. 
  •  Accountability
    • Most of us need some support in holding ourselves accountable to trying out new methods or ideas.  We collaborate in determining how you’ll hold yourself accountable.
  • Mindfulness
    • Mindfulness techniques can help increase awareness and improve self-regulation.  Transformation–within a person, relationship, or organization—occurs more easily when we’re more present to our experience.  

Getting Started…

GCS offers two free 1-hour coaching sessions, either in-person or via video-call, so that clients can determine if our approach feels helpful.  If it does, we will meet regularly (ideally weekly) for 10 additional 1-hour sessions. The fee for sessions 3 through 12 is $250 per session. The 12-session format works for most people, but we can continue beyond that if you’d like.  

What coaching is and is not

Our coaching approach employs curiosity, open-ended learning, guidance, and support as you define your vision of the future and then establish and implement an action-oriented strategy to move toward that vision.  It is very different from working with a consultant or therapist, although both of these approaches may also be helpful. We don’t provide advice, unless it’s requested outside of the coaching context. Nor do we focus on the past, for example, by learning how to heal from certain childhood experiences that may lie underneath long-standing patterns that may hold us back.  

John Gilvar’s Coaching Credentials

John is certified by the King County Coaching Program.   He is approaching the coaching hours total required for International Coaching Federation certification, having completed the required classroom training.

Confidentiality

All information will be held as confidential, except as required by law.

Resources:

https://coachfederation.org/

Other Articles

The Capitol

A Public Health Lens on Homelessness Exposes Problems with the Trump Administration’s Proposed Approach

A recent
University of California study titled Health
Conditions Among Unsheltered Adults in the U.S.
brings into focus
public policy blind spots that make progress challenging for clinicians and
other professionals working to end homelessness.  Personally, the study’s findings evoke a
question that preoccupied me during my tenure as director of a 10-agency
health care network
treating over 21,000 unduplicated homeless individuals
per year: Why do policy debates about homelessness pay such scant attention
to significant health needs that both precipitate the loss of housing and
create daunting obstacles to regaining stability after an individual or family has
become homeless?

Reflections on Leading for Racial Equity

Data unmistakably link race with poor health and housing outcomes, and leaders within public health agencies, community health care organizations, and housing and homeless services entities have attempted to develop new strategies to produce more equitable outcomes. In seeking deep and lasting impact, however, these leaders encounter barriers stemming from the persistent influence of unconscious bias and white supremacy that pervades our culture. For instance, researchers found that the most commonly used assessment tool for prioritizing access to scarce housing units for people experiencing homelessness results in statistically significant discrepancies in scores that favor whites over people of color. Genuine dialogue around these issues, which includes both clients and staff of color as well as managers at all levels, regardless of their racial identity, is needed.  

A top view of homeless beggar man with belongings outdoors in city.

Housing is Health Care. Yes, And…

As Public Health thought leaders push for greater understanding of the social determinants of health, they increasingly focus on stable, affordable housing as a critical piece of the puzzle for reducing the risk of worsening chronic health conditions, frequent and/or avoidable hospitalization, increased costs, and early mortality for vulnerable populations.   Kaiser-Permanente Chief Community Health Officer Bechara Choucair and National Health Care for the Homeless Council CEO Bobby Watts persuasively argue in Rx for Health: A Place to Call Home that “homelessness itself can accurately be characterized as a dangerous health condition.”[1] The statistics they cite demonstrating dramatic health outcome and mortality disparities for people experiencing homelessness strongly suggest that increasing access to safe and secure housing would, at a population health level, have an enormous impact. [2]  Simply stated, preventing people from losing their housing in the first place also prevents poor health outcomes.  In turn, re-housing people who have become homeless reduces the danger of rapidly deteriorating health that is part and parcel of homelessness.  Yet there are thousands upon thousands of people across the U.S. whose unmanaged chronic conditions have already been exacerbated by homelessness.  Effectively and sustainably addressing their needs entails grappling with an array of policy and operational challenges.  

The Aging Homeless Population: Resetting Policy Priorities

National experts have called out the aging of the homeless population as an impending crisis. [1] This demographic shift is happening rapidly, mirroring general population trends. Nationwide, currently half of single homeless adults are aged 50 or older, compared to 11% in 1990. [2] Moreover, according to a white paper prepared by the Corporation for Supportive Housing (CSH) and presented to a New York City coalition studying ways to address the aging of the homeless population, “not only are those on the streets getting older, but their health is deteriorating at rates much faster than the general population.” [3] The paper cites research showing that homeless adults over 50 had a higher prevalence of geriatric conditions than that seen in housed adults 20 years older. [4] Another study showed that older homeless adults were 3.6 times as likely to have a chronic medical condition as homeless adults under 50. [5] Such findings clearly indicate a pressing need for housing and services that specifically address geriatric conditions among older homeless adults living across varied environments. [6]